telebookstall

The comfort zone is based on an assumption that the current state of being happy is undesirable, and that the state after suffering is desirable. Avoiding pain and seeking pleasure is a natural instinct in life, but the comfort zone tells us that instinct is undesirable. Happiness is almost considered the highest pursuit in life, but the comfort zone tells us to constantly endure suffering. Isn't happiness something that should be pursued? If we suffer because we pursue happiness, can that suffering still be called suffering? PUA, manipulating someone's mind, is about destroying their original beliefs and establishing a new set of concepts, how similar this is to the way civilization instructs people. With such changes in the way it influences groups, how can this kind of civilization truly be civilized? Both of the above tear apart the connection between individual thinking and the individual themselves, this is not individualism. Without individualism as an anchor of meaning, our concepts will be repeatedly against our instincts. Sometimes we need to believe in our feelings like primitive humans. Don't be too "civilized". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oV_xNjKLGKE&t=2069s https://t.me/telebookstall/1934